Watch 2020 Dem Shred Trump For ‘Embarrassment’ On World Stage | The Beat With Ari Melber | MSNBC


STARTING TO COME INTO FOCUS AND STARTING TO COME INTO FOCUS AND GETTING A BIT SMALLER. GETTING A BIT SMALLER. THREE CANDIDATES DROPPING OUT IN THREE CANDIDATES DROPPING OUT IN THE PAST TWO WEEKS. THE PAST TWO WEEKS. AT THE SAME TIME, OTHERS AT THE SAME TIME, OTHERS APPEARING TO PICK UP STEAM. APPEARING TO PICK UP STEAM. ELIZABETH WARREN DRAWING AN ELIZABETH WARREN DRAWING AN ESTIMATED 15,000 PEOPLE TO A ESTIMATED 15,000 PEOPLE TO A RALLY IN SEATTLE THIS WEEK, AND RALLY IN SEATTLE THIS WEEK, AND BERNIE SANDERS GRABBING BERNIE SANDERS GRABBING HEADLINES WITH SHARP ATTACKS ON HEADLINES WITH SHARP ATTACKS ON MITCH McCONNELL WHILE SANDERS MITCH McCONNELL WHILE SANDERS CAMPAIGNED IN KENTUCKY. CAMPAIGNED IN KENTUCKY. AND IN TWO DAYS, A BIG TEST FOR AND IN TWO DAYS, A BIG TEST FOR EVERYONE, WEDNESDAY IS THE EVERYONE, WEDNESDAY IS THE DEADLINE FOR CANDIDATES TRYING DEADLINE FOR CANDIDATES TRYING TO QUALIFY FOR THE NEXT DEBATE. TO QUALIFY FOR THE NEXT DEBATE. MORE THAN HALF OF THE FIELD MORE THAN HALF OF THE FIELD STILL HASN’T QUALIFIED. STILL HASN’T QUALIFIED. MY NEXT GUEST IS FIGHTING TO MY NEXT GUEST IS FIGHTING TO MAKE THE DEBATE STAGE NEXT MONTH MAKE THE DEBATE STAGE NEXT MONTH IN HOUSTON. IN HOUSTON. 2020 PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE AND 2020 PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE AND SENATOR FROM NEW YORK, KIRSTEN SENATOR FROM NEW YORK, KIRSTEN GILLIBRAND. GILLIBRAND. SENATOR, THANK YOU VERY MUCH FOR SENATOR, THANK YOU VERY MUCH FOR JOINING US. JOINING US. LET ME BEGIN WITH YOUR THOUGHTS LET ME BEGIN WITH YOUR THOUGHTS ABOUT HOW CONCERNED YOU WON’T ABOUT HOW CONCERNED YOU WON’T MAKE THAT DEBATE CUT OFF IN THE MAKE THAT DEBATE CUT OFF IN THE NEXT TWO DAYS. NEXT TWO DAYS.>>I WILL MAKE THAT DEBATE>>I WILL MAKE THAT DEBATE STAGE. STAGE. I INTEND TO DO SO. I INTEND TO DO SO. AND I HOPE THAT YOUR VIEWERS GO AND I HOPE THAT YOUR VIEWERS GO TO KIRSTEN GILLIBRAND.COM AND TO KIRSTEN GILLIBRAND.COM AND SEND A DOLLAR SO THAT I CAN SEND A DOLLAR SO THAT I CAN QUALIFY. QUALIFY. BUT I’M REALLY EXCITED ABOUT OUR BUT I’M REALLY EXCITED ABOUT OUR CAMPAIGN BECAUSE I FELT LIKE CAMPAIGN BECAUSE I FELT LIKE WE’VE LED THE DEBATE ON WE’VE LED THE DEBATE ON REPRODUCTIVE FREEDOM, GOING TO REPRODUCTIVE FREEDOM, GOING TO THE FRONT LINES OF GEORGIA AND THE FRONT LINES OF GEORGIA AND MISSOURI, ON GAY RIGHTS IN THIS MISSOURI, ON GAY RIGHTS IN THIS COUNTRY AND GETTING THAT COUNTRY AND GETTING THAT POLITICS, ALL ISSUES WE NEED TO POLITICS, ALL ISSUES WE NEED TO BE DEBATED ON THE NEXT STAGE BE DEBATED ON THE NEXT STAGE WHICH IS WHY I INTEND TO GET WHICH IS WHY I INTEND TO GET THERE. THERE.>>FAIR POINT, BUT THERE AREN’T>>FAIR POINT, BUT THERE AREN’T ANY SPECIFIC POLLS BETWEEN NOW ANY SPECIFIC POLLS BETWEEN NOW AND THEN TO SUGGEST THAT YOU AND THEN TO SUGGEST THAT YOU WILL PERHAPS MAKE THAT DEBATE WILL PERHAPS MAKE THAT DEBATE STAGE. STAGE. YOU NEED TO MEET BOTH OF THOSE. YOU NEED TO MEET BOTH OF THOSE. THE DONOR THRESHOLD AND THREE THE DONOR THRESHOLD AND THREE MORE QUALIFYING POLLS. MORE QUALIFYING POLLS. DO YOU HAVE AN UPDATE AS TO DO YOU HAVE AN UPDATE AS TO WHERE YOU STAND ON BOTH OF THOSE WHERE YOU STAND ON BOTH OF THOSE TODAY? TODAY?>>WE JUST HAD A QUALIFYING POLL>>WE JUST HAD A QUALIFYING POLL OUT OF IOWA AND WE’RE HOPING OUT OF IOWA AND WE’RE HOPING THERE’S MORE LOCAL POLLS IN THERE’S MORE LOCAL POLLS IN IOWA, NEW HAMPSHIRE, STATES IOWA, NEW HAMPSHIRE, STATES WHERE I’VE SPENT A LOT OF TIME. WHERE I’VE SPENT A LOT OF TIME. I’VE BEEN THERE ALMOST A DOZEN I’VE BEEN THERE ALMOST A DOZEN TIMES EACH. TIMES EACH. AND IT MAKES A DIFFERENCE TO AND IT MAKES A DIFFERENCE TO TALK TO THE FIRST OF THE NATION TALK TO THE FIRST OF THE NATION PRIMARY AND CAUCUS GOERS ABOUT PRIMARY AND CAUCUS GOERS ABOUT YOUR VISION AND WHY YOU BELIEVE YOUR VISION AND WHY YOU BELIEVE YOU’RE THE BEST PERSON TO TAKE YOU’RE THE BEST PERSON TO TAKE ON TRUMP AND THAT’S EXACTLY WHAT ON TRUMP AND THAT’S EXACTLY WHAT I’VE DONE. I’VE DONE.>>SENATOR, LET ME GET YOUR>>SENATOR, LET ME GET YOUR THOUGHTS ON THE G7 AND TURNING THOUGHTS ON THE G7 AND TURNING TO SOME OF THE BIG ISSUES TO SOME OF THE BIG ISSUES AFFECTING THE WORLD. AFFECTING THE WORLD. TODAY TRUMP SUGGESTED HOSTING TODAY TRUMP SUGGESTED HOSTING THE NEXT G7 AT HIS DORAL RESORT THE NEXT G7 AT HIS DORAL RESORT IN FLORIDA. IN FLORIDA. WHAT IS YOUR REACTION TO THAT? WHAT IS YOUR REACTION TO THAT?>>I THINK IT’S ENTIRELY>>I THINK IT’S ENTIRELY UNACCEPTABLE AND SOUNDS LIKE UNACCEPTABLE AND SOUNDS LIKE HE’S LINING HIS OWN POCKETS. HE’S LINING HIS OWN POCKETS. IT IS INAPPROPRIATE ON EVERY IT IS INAPPROPRIATE ON EVERY LEVEL, AND I THINK PRESIDENT LEVEL, AND I THINK PRESIDENT TRUMP REALLY HARMED AMERICA’S TRUMP REALLY HARMED AMERICA’S ECONOMY AND FUTURE IN HOW HE ECONOMY AND FUTURE IN HOW HE HANDLED THE G7 MEETINGS. HANDLED THE G7 MEETINGS. I THINK SIX OF THE PARTICIPANTS I THINK SIX OF THE PARTICIPANTS ARE WORKING TOGETHER TO GET ARE WORKING TOGETHER TO GET THINGS DONE, AND AMERICA IS THINGS DONE, AND AMERICA IS REALLY ON THE SIDE LINES. REALLY ON THE SIDE LINES.>>LET ME ACTUALLY PLAY YOU THIS>>LET ME ACTUALLY PLAY YOU THIS SOUND BITE AND I’LL GET YOUR SOUND BITE AND I’LL GET YOUR REACTION FROM T. THIS IS REACTION FROM T. THIS IS PRESIDENT TRUMP TALKING ABOUT PRESIDENT TRUMP TALKING ABOUT RUSSIA REJOINING THE G7. RUSSIA REJOINING THE G7.>>I THINK IT WOULD BE BETTER TO>>I THINK IT WOULD BE BETTER TO HAVE RUSSIA INSIDE THE TENT THAN HAVE RUSSIA INSIDE THE TENT THAN OUTSIDE THE TENT. OUTSIDE THE TENT. DO WE LIVE VIA THE WAY? DO WE LIVE VIA THE WAY? YES, WE LIVE VIA THE WAY. YES, WE LIVE VIA THE WAY. IS IT POLITICALLY POPULAR FOR ME IS IT POLITICALLY POPULAR FOR ME TO SAY THAT? TO SAY THAT? POSSIBLY NOT. POSSIBLY NOT. I THINK A LOT OF PEOPLE WOULD I THINK A LOT OF PEOPLE WOULD AGREE WITH ME FRANKLY, POSSIBLY AGREE WITH ME FRANKLY, POSSIBLY NOT. NOT. I DO NOTHING FOR POLITICS. I DO NOTHING FOR POLITICS.>>SENATOR, WHAT IS YOUR>>SENATOR, WHAT IS YOUR REACTION TO THAT STATEMENT ABOUT REACTION TO THAT STATEMENT ABOUT RUSSIA AND THE FACT THAT THE RUSSIA AND THE FACT THAT THE PRESIDENT SAYING HE DOES NOTHING PRESIDENT SAYING HE DOES NOTHING FOR POLITICS? FOR POLITICS? DOES THAT SURPRISE YOU? DOES THAT SURPRISE YOU?>>PRESIDENT TRUMP IS AN>>PRESIDENT TRUMP IS AN EMBARRASSMENT ON THE WORLD EMBARRASSMENT ON THE WORLD STAGE. STAGE. HE’S UNWILLING TO STAND UP TO HE’S UNWILLING TO STAND UP TO PUTIN. PUTIN. AND THE REASON WHY RUSSIA IS NOT AND THE REASON WHY RUSSIA IS NOT INCLUDED IS BECAUSE OF THEIR INCLUDED IS BECAUSE OF THEIR BEHAVIOR, BECAUSE OF THEIR BEHAVIOR, BECAUSE OF THEIR EFFORTS TO ANNEX ANOTHER EFFORTS TO ANNEX ANOTHER COUNTRY, TO ACTUALLY TRY TO COUNTRY, TO ACTUALLY TRY TO UNDERMINE ANOTHER COUNTRY’S UNDERMINE ANOTHER COUNTRY’S SOVEREIGNTY. SOVEREIGNTY. THAT IS WHY THEY WERE EXCLUDED, THAT IS WHY THEY WERE EXCLUDED, BECAUSE OF THEIR BEHAVIOR. BECAUSE OF THEIR BEHAVIOR. AND PRESIDENT TRUMP IS UNWILLING AND PRESIDENT TRUMP IS UNWILLING TO STAND UP TO STRONG MEN, TO STAND UP TO STRONG MEN, UNWILLING TO STAND UP TO PUTIN, UNWILLING TO STAND UP TO PUTIN, AND WE’VE SEEN IT. AND WE’VE SEEN IT. WE’VE SEEN IT FROM HIS WE’VE SEEN IT FROM HIS PERFORMANCE AT HELSINKI, AND HIS PERFORMANCE AT HELSINKI, AND HIS PERFORMANCE JUST RECENTLY. PERFORMANCE JUST RECENTLY.>>ONE . MORE TELLING MOMENTS>>ONE . MORE TELLING MOMENTS OF THE G7 SUMMIT WAS PRESIDENT OF THE G7 SUMMIT WAS PRESIDENT TRUMP’S SKIPPING THE CLIMATE TRUMP’S SKIPPING THE CLIMATE MEETING. MEETING. WAS IT A MISTAKE ALSO FOR THE WAS IT A MISTAKE ALSO FOR THE DNC TO REJECT HOLDING A CLIMATE DNC TO REJECT HOLDING A CLIMATE CHANGE DEBATE SPECIFICALLY ABOUT CHANGE DEBATE SPECIFICALLY ABOUT THIS TOPIC, IF YOU’RE TRYING TO THIS TOPIC, IF YOU’RE TRYING TO ENCOURAGE VOTERS OR PEOPLE IN ENCOURAGE VOTERS OR PEOPLE IN AMERICA TO TAKE CLIMATE CHANGE AMERICA TO TAKE CLIMATE CHANGE SERIOUSLY, AND YOU HAVE A SERIOUSLY, AND YOU HAVE A CLIMATE DENIER AS PRESIDENT NOT CLIMATE DENIER AS PRESIDENT NOT ATTENDING G7 MEETINGS ABOUT IT ATTENDING G7 MEETINGS ABOUT IT AND THE DNC NOT HOLDING DEBATES AND THE DNC NOT HOLDING DEBATES ABOUT IT, WHAT DO YOU MAKE OF ABOUT IT, WHAT DO YOU MAKE OF THAT? THAT?>>I WILL MAKE ATTACKING GLOBAL>>I WILL MAKE ATTACKING GLOBAL CLIMATE CHANGE A CORNERSTONE OF CLIMATE CHANGE A CORNERSTONE OF MY PRESIDENCY. MY PRESIDENCY. IF YOU HAVE A THREAT AS GRAVE AS IF YOU HAVE A THREAT AS GRAVE AS GLOBAL CLIMATE CHANGE TO GLOBAL CLIMATE CHANGE TO HUMANITY, YOU NEED A SOLUTION HUMANITY, YOU NEED A SOLUTION THAT IS AS BOLD AND AS BIG AS THAT IS AS BOLD AND AS BIG AS THE PROBLEM YOU’RE TRYING TO THE PROBLEM YOU’RE TRYING TO FACE. FACE. AND I CAN PASS A GREEN NEW DEAL. AND I CAN PASS A GREEN NEW DEAL. I KNOW HOW TO GET THINGS DONE. I KNOW HOW TO GET THINGS DONE. I CAN REACH ACROSS THE AISLE AND I CAN REACH ACROSS THE AISLE AND HAVE INVESTMENTS IN HAVE INVESTMENTS IN INFRASTRUCTURE, IN GREEN JOBS, INFRASTRUCTURE, IN GREEN JOBS, IN CLEAN AIR, CLEAN WATER. IN CLEAN AIR, CLEAN WATER. I WILL PUT A PRICE ON CARBON. I WILL PUT A PRICE ON CARBON. I WILL MAKE SURE THE POLLUTERS I WILL MAKE SURE THE POLLUTERS PAY. PAY. I PUT FORWARD A ROBUST POLICY, A I PUT FORWARD A ROBUST POLICY, A PUBLIC/PRIVATE PARTNERSHIPS AS PUBLIC/PRIVATE PARTNERSHIPS AS WELL AS STATE INVESTMENTS INTO WELL AS STATE INVESTMENTS INTO ATTACKING GLOBAL CLIMATE CHANGE ATTACKING GLOBAL CLIMATE CHANGE AGGRESSIVELY BECAUSE I THINK WE AGGRESSIVELY BECAUSE I THINK WE SHOULD GET TO NET ZERO CARBON SHOULD GET TO NET ZERO CARBON EMISSIONS BY 2050. EMISSIONS BY 2050. I THINK WE SHOULD HAVE NET ZERO I THINK WE SHOULD HAVE NET ZERO CARBON EMISSIONS IN THE NEXT TEN CARBON EMISSIONS IN THE NEXT TEN YEARS. YEARS. IT’S AN ASPIRATIONAL GOAL THAT IT’S AN ASPIRATIONAL GOAL THAT WILL BE A MEASURE OF OUR WILL BE A MEASURE OF OUR COMPETITIVENESS AND HOW GREAT COMPETITIVENESS AND HOW GREAT OUR ENGINEERS ASK SIGNISTS ARE. OUR ENGINEERS ASK SIGNISTS ARE. I WILL NOT ONLY RE-SIGN ONTO OUR I WILL NOT ONLY RE-SIGN ONTO OUR GLOBAL CLIMATE ACCORDS, BUT I GLOBAL CLIMATE ACCORDS, BUT I WILL LEAD A WORLDWIDE WILL LEAD A WORLDWIDE CONVERSATION ABOUT WHAT WE CAN CONVERSATION ABOUT WHAT WE CAN DO MORE. DO MORE. I WILL NOT START A SPACE RACE I WILL NOT START A SPACE RACE WITH RUSSIA. WITH RUSSIA.>>RIGHT.>>RIGHT.>>I WILL START A GREEN ENERGY>>I WILL START A GREEN ENERGY RACE WITH CHINA AND THAT’S HOW RACE WITH CHINA AND THAT’S HOW YOU GET IT DONE. YOU GET IT DONE.>>LET ME GET YOUR FINAL>>LET ME GET YOUR FINAL THOUGHTS ON A DEBATE THAT IS THOUGHTS ON A DEBATE THAT IS TAKING PLACE AMONG THE TAKING PLACE AMONG THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY. DEMOCRATIC PARTY. LAST WEEK JILL BIDEN SAID HER LAST WEEK JILL BIDEN SAID HER HUSBAND JOE IS THE MOST HUSBAND JOE IS THE MOST ELECTABLE EVEN IF HE’S NOT THE ELECTABLE EVEN IF HE’S NOT THE DEMOCRATIC VOTERS’ FAVORITE. DEMOCRATIC VOTERS’ FAVORITE. I’M CURIOUS TO GET YOUR I’M CURIOUS TO GET YOUR THOUGHTS. THOUGHTS. IS ELECTABILITY SIMPLY ENOUGH OF IS ELECTABILITY SIMPLY ENOUGH OF AN ARGUMENT FOR VOTE TOERZ GO AN ARGUMENT FOR VOTE TOERZ GO OUT AND CHOOSE A CANDIDATE? OUT AND CHOOSE A CANDIDATE? IS IT YOU TO SAY CAN YOU BEAT IS IT YOU TO SAY CAN YOU BEAT DONALD TRUMP OR SHOULD YOU DONALD TRUMP OR SHOULD YOU REPRESENT SOMETHING BIGGER THAN REPRESENT SOMETHING BIGGER THAN THAT? THAT?>>I THINK THE ISSUES WE FACE>>I THINK THE ISSUES WE FACE ARE BIGGER THAN THAT, BUT I DO ARE BIGGER THAN THAT, BUT I DO THINK YOU HAVE TO BEAT DONALD THINK YOU HAVE TO BEAT DONALD TRUMP. TRUMP. AND I BELIEVE THAT I HAVE THE AND I BELIEVE THAT I HAVE THE MOST ELECTABLE EXPERIENCE THAN MOST ELECTABLE EXPERIENCE THAN ANYONE. ANYONE. NOT ONLY DID I RUN IN A 2-1 NOT ONLY DID I RUN IN A 2-1 REPUBLICAN DISTRICT TWICE AND REPUBLICAN DISTRICT TWICE AND WON BY 24 POINTS, BUT I JUST WON WON BY 24 POINTS, BUT I JUST WON BACK 18 COUNTIES THAT WENT TO BACK 18 COUNTIES THAT WENT TO TRUMP. TRUMP. AND I BROUGHT TOGETHER MY STATE AND I BROUGHT TOGETHER MY STATE WITH THE HIGHEST VOTE THRESHOLD WITH THE HIGHEST VOTE THRESHOLD IN ITS HISTORY. IN ITS HISTORY. HIGHER THAN OBAMA, HIGHER THAN HIGHER THAN OBAMA, HIGHER THAN HILLARY, HIGHER THAN TRUMP, HILLARY, HIGHER THAN TRUMP, HIGHER THAN ANYONE THAT’S RUN HIGHER THAN ANYONE THAT’S RUN FOR SENATE OR GOVERNOR EVER. FOR SENATE OR GOVERNOR EVER. NOT ONLY ELECTORALLY, BUT I NOT ONLY ELECTORALLY, BUT I BRING PEOPLE TOGETHER TO GET BRING PEOPLE TOGETHER TO GET THINGS DONE. THINGS DONE. I PASSED 18 BILLS IN THE LAST I PASSED 18 BILLS IN THE LAST CONGRESS, ALL OF WHICH PRESIDENT CONGRESS, ALL OF WHICH PRESIDENT TRUMP SIGNED ONTO LAW. TRUMP SIGNED ONTO LAW. HE DOES NOT KNOW HE SIGNED MY HE DOES NOT KNOW HE SIGNED MY BILLS, BUT HE DID. BILLS, BUT HE DID. AND THAT’S BECAUSE I CAN BRING AND THAT’S BECAUSE I CAN BRING THIS COUNTRY TOGETHER. THIS COUNTRY TOGETHER. SO YOU DO NEED TO BEAT TRUMP, SO YOU DO NEED TO BEAT TRUMP, NUMBER ONE. NUMBER ONE. AND NUMBER TWO, YOU NEED TO AND NUMBER TWO, YOU NEED TO RESTORE THIS NATION AND BRING IT RESTORE THIS NATION AND BRING IT BACK TOGETHER AGAIN. BACK TOGETHER AGAIN. HEAL THE WOUNDS THAT HAVE BEEN HEAL THE WOUNDS THAT HAVE BEEN CREATED, THE DIVIDES CREATED BY CREATED, THE DIVIDES CREATED BY PRESIDENT TRUMP AND MOVE US PRESIDENT TRUMP AND MOVE US FORWARD AND RESTORE OUR MORAL FORWARD AND RESTORE OUR MORAL LEADERSHIP ON THE WORLD STAGE. LEADERSHIP ON THE WORLD STAGE. THAT’S WHY I’M RUNNING AND THAT’S WHY I’M RUNNING AND THAT’S WHY I BELIEVE I’M THE THAT’S WHY I BELIEVE I’M THE BEST CANDIDATE TO BEAT TRUMP. BEST CANDIDATE TO BEAT TRUMP.>>ALL RIGHT.>>ALL RIGHT. WE’LL WAIT AND SEE IF YOU DO IN WE’LL WAIT AND SEE IF YOU DO IN FACT MAKE IT TO THAT FINAL FACT MAKE IT TO THAT FINAL DEBATE THRESHOLD IN THE DEBATE THRESHOLD IN THE COUPLE — IN THE NEXT COUPLE OF

, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Post navigation

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *